Radeon 630 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 630 is positioned at rank #292 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 630

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

98%

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

95%

#282

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

689%

#284

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

625%

#285

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

623%

#289

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

567%

#290

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

563%

#292

Radeon 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#293

GeForce MX330

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

99%

#297

Radeon RX 780

MSRP: $499|Avg: $721

97%

#300

GeForce 940MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

96%

#301

GeForce MX130

MSRP: $120|Avg: $50

95%

#302

Arc Graphics 130V

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

95%

#303

Radeon R5 430

MSRP: $59|Avg: $50

95%

#304

GeForce MX150

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

95%

#307

GeForce MX450

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 630 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 630 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon 630	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Longevity	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $50 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 0.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon 630.

Insight	Radeon 630	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+0.4%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 630 Benchmark Check

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 630 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Radeon 630

The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 630 scores 1,575 and the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 630 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 uses Generation 8.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 630) vs 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 800 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 630	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
G3D Mark Score	1,575	1,582
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Generation 8.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	512+33%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.247 TFLOPS+103%	0.6144 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1218 MHz+52%	800 MHz
ROPs	16+167%	6
TMUs	32	48+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 630	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 630 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 0 MB. The Radeon 630 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	Radeon 630	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 630 draws 50W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P6300's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 630) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	Radeon 630	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
TDP	50W	15W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	31.5	105.5+235%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 630 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 and now averages $50. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.5 (Radeon 630) vs 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) — the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers 0.3% better value. The Radeon 630 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).