Radeon 630 vs Quadro K2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 630 is positioned at rank 292 and the Quadro K2000 is on rank 261, so the Quadro K2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 630

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

98%

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

95%

#282

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

689%

#284

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

625%

#285

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

623%

#289

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

567%

#290

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

563%

#292

Radeon 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#293

GeForce MX330

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

99%

#297

Radeon RX 780

MSRP: $499|Avg: $721

97%

#300

GeForce 940MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

96%

#301

GeForce MX130

MSRP: $120|Avg: $50

95%

#302

Arc Graphics 130V

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

95%

#303

Radeon R5 430

MSRP: $59|Avg: $50

95%

#304

GeForce MX150

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

95%

#307

GeForce MX450

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

98%

#108

Quadro M6000

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500

89%

#245

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5596%

#260

GRID P4-8Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200

100%

#261

Quadro K2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

100%

#263

FirePro 3D V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $30

97%

#264

GRID M3-3020

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

95%

#265

GRID P40-8Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

95%

#266

GRID M40

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

95%

#267

FirePro V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

94%

#268

FirePro V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $15

94%

#269

FirePro 3D V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $40

93%

#270

FirePro S9050

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825

93%

#271

FirePro R5000

MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150

91%

#272

GRID M6-8Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

90%

#275

GRID K120Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $20

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 630 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Radeon 630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 630.

Insight	Radeon 630	Quadro K2000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Longevity	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon 630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $500 for the Quadro K2000, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 895.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon 630	Quadro K2000
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+895.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($50)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 630 Benchmark Check

Quadro K2000 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 630 and Quadro K2000

Radeon 630

The Radeon 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

Quadro K2000

The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 630 scores 1,575 and the Quadro K2000 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 630 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro K2000 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 630) vs 384 (Quadro K2000). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 630) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000).

Feature	Radeon 630	Quadro K2000
G3D Mark Score	1,575	1,582
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512+33%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.247 TFLOPS+70%	0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	128 KB+300%	32 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 630	Quadro K2000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 630 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000 has 2 GB. The Quadro K2000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon 630) vs 256 KB (Quadro K2000) — the Radeon 630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 630	Quadro K2000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 630 draws 50W versus the Quadro K2000's 51W — a 2% difference. The Radeon 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 630) vs 350W (Quadro K2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon 630	Quadro K2000
TDP	50W-2%	51W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	202mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	31.5+2%	31.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 630 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro K2000 launched at $599 and now averages $500. The Radeon 630 costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.5 (Radeon 630) vs 3.2 (Quadro K2000) — the Radeon 630 offers 884.4% better value. The Radeon 630 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).