
RADEON E2400 vs GeForce 6600 LE

RADEON E2400
Popular choices:

GeForce 6600 LE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON E2400 is positioned at rank 351 and the GeForce 6600 LE is on rank 319, so the GeForce 6600 LE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON E2400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6600 LE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON E2400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6600 LE.
| Insight | RADEON E2400 | GeForce 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6600 LE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 6600 LE holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $100), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 226.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON E2400 | GeForce 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+226.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON E2400 and GeForce 6600 LE

RADEON E2400
The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce 6600 LE
The GeForce 6600 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 823 MHz to 888 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON E2400 scores 52 and the GeForce 6600 LE reaches 51 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON E2400 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce 6600 LE uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON E2400) vs 1,152 (GeForce 6600 LE). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400) vs 2.046 TFLOPS (GeForce 6600 LE). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 888 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | GeForce 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 52+2% | 51 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1152+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS | 2.046 TFLOPS+125% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz+27% | 888 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 96+300% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | GeForce 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON E2400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6600 LE has 256 MB. The RADEON E2400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | GeForce 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON E2400 draws 50W versus the GeForce 6600 LE's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The RADEON E2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON E2400) vs 350W (GeForce 6600 LE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | GeForce 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-62% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 180mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0+150% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON E2400 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce 6600 LE launched at $30 and now averages $30. The GeForce 6600 LE costs 70% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.5 (RADEON E2400) vs 1.7 (GeForce 6600 LE) — the GeForce 6600 LE offers 240% better value. The RADEON E2400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | GeForce 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $30-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $30-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | 1.7+240% |
| Codename | Lexa | GK104 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | August 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #773 | #799 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















