RADEON E2400 vs RADEON X550XT
RADEON E2400
Popular choices:
RADEON X550XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON E2400 is positioned at rank 351 and the RADEON X550XT is on rank 330, so the RADEON X550XT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON E2400
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X550XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X550XT uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON X550XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON E2400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X550XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON E2400.
| Insight | RADEON E2400 | RADEON X550XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X550XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $100 for the RADEON E2400, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 169.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON E2400 | RADEON X550XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+169.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON E2400 and RADEON X550XT
RADEON E2400
The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.
RADEON X550XT
The RADEON X550XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 56 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON E2400 scores 52 versus the RADEON X550XT's 56 — the RADEON X550XT leads by 7.7%. The RADEON E2400 is built on GCN 4.0 while the RADEON X550XT uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (RADEON E2400) vs 512 (RADEON X550XT). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (RADEON X550XT). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | RADEON X550XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 52 | 56+8% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1218 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | RADEON X550XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | RADEON X550XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON E2400 draws 50W versus the RADEON X550XT's 50W — a 0% difference. The RADEON X550XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON E2400) vs 350W (RADEON X550XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | RADEON X550XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0 | 1.1+10% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON E2400 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the RADEON X550XT launched at $50 and now averages $40. The RADEON X550XT costs 60% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.5 (RADEON E2400) vs 1.4 (RADEON X550XT) — the RADEON X550XT offers 180% better value. The RADEON X550XT is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | RADEON X550XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $50-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $40-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | 1.4+180% |
| Codename | Lexa | Lexa |
| Release | April 20 2017 | March 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #773 | #772 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON E2400 and RADEON X550XT
