RADEON E2400 vs Radeon X1300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON E2400 vs Radeon X1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON E2400 vs Radeon X1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON E2400

2017

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (52 vs 58).
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon X1300

2020

Why buy it

✅+11.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 11.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅RADEON E2400 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1300 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon X1300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 11.5% in PassMark G3D (58 vs 52), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon X1300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $100 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 11.5% (0.6 vs 0.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

RADEON E2400 vs Radeon X1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON E2400

The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon X1300

The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON E2400 scores 52 versus the Radeon X1300's 58 — the Radeon X1300 leads by 11.5%. The RADEON E2400 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon X1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON E2400) vs 1,408 (Radeon X1300). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

Feature	RADEON E2400	Radeon X1300
G3D Mark Score	52	58+12%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	1408+267%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9085 TFLOPS	4.632 TFLOPS+410%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1645 MHz+46%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	88+267%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON E2400	Radeon X1300
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON E2400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1300 carries 256 MB. RADEON E2400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON E2400 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1300. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (RADEON E2400) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON E2400	Radeon X1300
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON E2400 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1300's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The RADEON E2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON E2400) vs 350W (Radeon X1300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON E2400	Radeon X1300
TDP	50W-50%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	1.0+67%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON E2400 came in at $100, while the Radeon X1300 launched at $100. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (RADEON E2400) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 offers 20% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1300 (2020 vs 2017).

Feature	RADEON E2400	Radeon X1300
MSRP	$100	$100
Performance per Dollar	0.5	0.6+20%
Codename	Lexa	Navi 14
Release	April 20 2017	May 28 2020
Ranking	#773	#336

Search RADEON E2400 on Amazon

Search Radeon X1300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.