GeForce G 103M vs RADEON E2400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G 103M vs RADEON E2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G 103M vs RADEON E2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G 103M

2017

Why buy it

✅+21.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

RADEON E2400

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (52 vs 63).
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce G 103M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 21.2% in PassMark G3D (63 vs 52), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce G 103M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON E2400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON E2400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce G 103M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce G 103M vs RADEON E2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G 103M

The GeForce G 103M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points. Launch price was $79.

RADEON E2400

The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce G 103M scores 63 versus the RADEON E2400's 52 — the GeForce G 103M leads by 21.2%. The GeForce G 103M is built on Pascal while the RADEON E2400 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G 103M) vs 384 (RADEON E2400). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G 103M) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	GeForce G 103M	RADEON E2400
G3D Mark Score	63+21%	52
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS+24%	0.9085 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1468 MHz+31%	1124 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	144 KB+50%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G 103M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON E2400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce G 103M	RADEON E2400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G 103M and 64-bit on the RADEON E2400.

Feature	GeForce G 103M	RADEON E2400
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G 103M draws 30W versus the RADEON E2400's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce G 103M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G 103M) vs 350W (RADEON E2400). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.