Radeon 2100 vs RADEON E2400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 2100 vs RADEON E2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 2100 vs RADEON E2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 2100

2019

Why buy it

✅+15.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅RADEON E2400 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 2100 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
49% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

RADEON E2400

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (52 vs 60).
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 2100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 15.4% in PassMark G3D (60 vs 52), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 2100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON E2400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 29.1% (0.5 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON E2400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 2100 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 2100 vs RADEON E2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 2100

The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

RADEON E2400

The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 2100 scores 60 versus the RADEON E2400's 52 — the Radeon 2100 leads by 15.4%. The Radeon 2100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON E2400 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 2100) vs 384 (RADEON E2400). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 2100	RADEON E2400
G3D Mark Score	60+15%	52
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	0.9085 TFLOPS+16%
Boost Clock	1024 MHz	1124 MHz+10%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 2100	RADEON E2400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 2100 and 64-bit on the RADEON E2400. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 2100) vs 512 KB (RADEON E2400) — the RADEON E2400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 2100	RADEON E2400
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 2100 draws 50W versus the RADEON E2400's 50W — a 0% difference. The RADEON E2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 2100) vs 350W (RADEON E2400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Radeon 2100	RADEON E2400
TDP	50W	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	1.2+20%	1.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 2100 came in at $149, while the RADEON E2400 launched at $100. On MSRP, RADEON E2400 was 32.9% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Radeon 2100) vs 0.5 (RADEON E2400) — the RADEON E2400 offers 25% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 2100 (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	Radeon 2100	RADEON E2400
MSRP	$149	$100-33%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	0.5+25%
Codename	Polaris 24	Lexa
Release	May 13 2019	April 20 2017
Ranking	#898	#773

Search Radeon 2100 on Amazon

Search RADEON E2400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.