Radeon 2100 vs GeForce Go 7400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 2100 is positioned at rank 725 and the GeForce Go 7400 is on rank 310, so the GeForce Go 7400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100

#715

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

27142%

#717

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

24605%

#718

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

24540%

#722

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

22315%

#723

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

22163%

#725

Radeon 2100

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

100%

#726

GeForce 6800

MSRP: $299|Avg: $50

95%

#727

Radeon 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $30

93%

#728

GeForce 6800 GT

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

90%

#729

GeForce 7950 GX2

MSRP: $599|Avg: $80

85%

#730

MOBILITY RADEON X1800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

83%

#731

Mobility Radeon X1450

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

83%

#732

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

75%

#733

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

MSRP: $20|Avg: $5

75%

#734

GeForce 6200

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

72%

#736

GeForce FX 5500

MSRP: $37|Avg: $30

55%

#737

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

MSRP: $229|Avg: $25

50%

#738

RADEON 9500

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

50%

#739

RADEON X850 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

40%

#740

RADEON 9800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $399

37%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7400

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

3297%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

3168%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

3131%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

3125%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

3119%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

3101%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

3062%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

3051%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

3023%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

3015%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

2978%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

2972%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

2918%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

2916%

#295

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

3636%

#310

GeForce Go 7400

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#311

Radeon HD 4270

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#312

Radeon E6460

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#313

Radeon HD 6290

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

95%

#314

GeForce GTX 280

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

90%

#315

Radeon HD 3470

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

89%

#316

Radeon HD 3000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

87%

#317

GeForce GT 120

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

85%

#318

Radeon HD 6250

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

85%

#319

GeForce 6600 LE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

77%

#320

Radeon HD 3670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

77%

#321

Radeon HD 3200

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

75%

#322

Radeon HD 2350

MSRP: $50|Avg: $48

70%

#323

Radeon HD 2400

MSRP: $79|Avg: $10

70%

#324

Radeon HD 2400 XT

MSRP: $79|Avg: $10

69%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 2100 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 7400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce Go 7400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon 2100	GeForce Go 7400
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-10%)	✅Leading raw performance (+10%)
Longevity	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 2100 Benchmark Check

GeForce Go 7400 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 2100 and GeForce Go 7400

Radeon 2100

The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

GeForce Go 7400

The GeForce Go 7400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 2100 scores 60 versus the GeForce Go 7400's 66 — the GeForce Go 7400 leads by 10%. The Radeon 2100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce Go 7400 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 2100) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7400). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7400).

Feature	Radeon 2100	GeForce Go 7400
G3D Mark Score	60	66+10%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS+3%	0.7626 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	96 KB+200%	32 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 2100	GeForce Go 7400
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 2100 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7400 has 256 MB. The Radeon 2100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 2100) vs 256 KB (GeForce Go 7400) — the GeForce Go 7400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 2100	GeForce Go 7400
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0b (Radeon 2100) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7400). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon 2100	GeForce Go 7400
DirectX	9.0b	9.0c
OpenGL	2.0	2.1+5%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon 2100) vs No (GeForce Go 7400). Decoder: Avivo vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7400).

Feature	Radeon 2100	GeForce Go 7400
Encoder	Avivo	No
Decoder	Avivo	PureVideo
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 2100 draws 50W versus the GeForce Go 7400's 64W — a 24.6% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 2100) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.