
Radeon 2100 vs GeForce 8200M G

Radeon 2100
Popular choices:

GeForce 8200M G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 2100 is positioned at rank #725 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 2100 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8200M G lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8200M G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 2100 | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.3%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 8200M G remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 2100 and GeForce 8200M G

Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

GeForce 8200M G
The GeForce 8200M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon 2100 scores 60 versus the GeForce 8200M G's 65 — the GeForce 8200M G leads by 8.3%. The Radeon 2100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce 8200M G uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 2100) vs 384 (GeForce 8200M G). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200M G). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 60 | 65+8% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 0.8632 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz | 1124 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+50% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 192 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1 MB+669% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 2100 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8200M G has 256 MB. The Radeon 2100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon 2100) vs 1 MB (GeForce 8200M G) — the GeForce 8200M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1 MB+669% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0b (Radeon 2100) vs 11.1 (FL10_0) (GeForce 8200M G). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0b | 11.1 (FL10_0)+23% |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 3.3+65% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: Avivo vs PureVideo HD (VP3). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 8200M G).
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | — |
| Decoder | Avivo | PureVideo HD (VP3) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 2100 draws 50W versus the GeForce 8200M G's 33W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 8200M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 2100) vs 350W (GeForce 8200M G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 33W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2 | 2.0+67% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 8200M G launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce 8200M G costs 100+% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (Radeon 2100) vs Infinity (GeForce 8200M G) — the GeForce 8200M G offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon 2100 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce 8200M G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | GM108 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #898 | #854 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















