Radeon 2100 vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Radeon 2100
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 2100 is positioned at rank #725 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 20791.7% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 2100.
| Insight | Radeon 2100 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-20791.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+20791.7%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 4798% better value per dollar than the Radeon 2100.
| Insight | Radeon 2100 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4798%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 2100 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon 2100 scores 60 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 20791.7%. The Radeon 2100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 2100) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 60 | 12,535+20792% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+1057% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz | 1777 MHz+74% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 0.09 MB | 2.5 MB+2678% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 2 MB+1438% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 2100 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon 2100) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 2 MB+1438% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0b (Radeon 2100) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0b | 12 Ultimate+33% |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6+130% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon 2100) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: Avivo vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | Avivo | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 2100 draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 2100) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-62% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 66°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2 | 96.4+7933% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The Radeon 2100 costs 76.6% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (Radeon 2100) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 4900% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-40% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-77% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 60.0+4900% |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | GA106 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #898 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 2100 and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
