
Radeon 2100 vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

Radeon 2100
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 2100 is positioned at rank #725 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 2100 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Radeon 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 2100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra.
| Insight | Radeon 2100 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 2100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 2100 and GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 2100 scores 60 and the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra reaches 59 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 2100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 2100) vs 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra).
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 60+2% | 59 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS+14% | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 256 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 384 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 2100 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has 256 MB. The Radeon 2100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 2100) vs 384 KB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 384 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0b (Radeon 2100) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0b | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 2.0+33% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 2100 draws 50W versus the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra's 116W — a 79.5% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 2100) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-57% | 116W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2+140% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra costs 100+% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (Radeon 2100) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon 2100 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon 2100 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | GF116 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | March 15 2011 |
| Ranking | #898 | #761 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















