RADEON E2400 vs Radeon 2100
RADEON E2400
Popular choices:
Radeon 2100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON E2400 is positioned at rank 351 and the Radeon 2100 is on rank 725, so the RADEON E2400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON E2400
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 2100 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON E2400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 2100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON E2400.
| Insight | RADEON E2400 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-15.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+15.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 2100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $49 versus $100 for the RADEON E2400, it costs 51% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 135.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON E2400 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+135.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON E2400 and Radeon 2100
RADEON E2400
The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.
Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON E2400 scores 52 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the Radeon 2100 leads by 15.4%. The RADEON E2400 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON E2400) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 52 | 60+15% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS+16% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz+10% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (RADEON E2400) vs 128 KB (Radeon 2100) — the RADEON E2400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON E2400 draws 50W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON E2400) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0 | 1.2+20% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON E2400 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149 and now averages $49. The Radeon 2100 costs 51% less ($51 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.5 (RADEON E2400) vs 1.2 (Radeon 2100) — the Radeon 2100 offers 140% better value. The Radeon 2100 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $49-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | 1.2+140% |
| Codename | Lexa | Polaris 24 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #773 | #898 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON E2400 and Radeon 2100
