RADEON E2400 vs GeForce FX Go5700
RADEON E2400
Popular choices:
GeForce FX Go5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON E2400 is positioned at rank 351 and the GeForce FX Go5700 is on rank 296, so the GeForce FX Go5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON E2400
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON E2400 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The RADEON E2400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX Go5700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON E2400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX Go5700.
| Insight | RADEON E2400 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON E2400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON E2400 and GeForce FX Go5700
RADEON E2400
The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.
GeForce FX Go5700
The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON E2400 scores 52 and the GeForce FX Go5700 reaches 51 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON E2400 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce FX Go5700 uses Rankine, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON E2400) vs 480 (GeForce FX Go5700). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700).
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 52+2% | 51 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 480+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS | 1.405 TFLOPS+55% |
| ROPs | 16 | 40+150% |
| TMUs | 24 | 60+150% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 960 KB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 640 KB+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (RADEON E2400) vs 640 KB (GeForce FX Go5700) — the GeForce FX Go5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 640 KB+25% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON E2400 draws 50W versus the GeForce FX Go5700's 219W — a 125.7% difference. The RADEON E2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON E2400) vs 350W (GeForce FX Go5700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-77% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0+400% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON E2400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | — |
| Codename | Lexa | GF110 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #773 | #497 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON E2400 and GeForce FX Go5700
