RADEON E2400 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2300
RADEON E2400
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 2300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON E2400 is positioned at rank 351 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is on rank 721, so the RADEON E2400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON E2400
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON E2400 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The RADEON E2400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON E2400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 2300.
| Insight | RADEON E2400 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $100), it costs 85% less, resulting in a 553.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON E2400 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+553.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON E2400 and Mobility Radeon HD 2300
RADEON E2400
The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.
Mobility Radeon HD 2300
The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON E2400 scores 52 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 reaches 51 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON E2400 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON E2400) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2300). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2300).
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 52+2% | 51 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+23% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+20% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (RADEON E2400) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) — the RADEON E2400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON E2400 draws 50W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2300's 50W — a 0% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON E2400) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON E2400 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 launched at $100 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 costs 85% less ($85 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.5 (RADEON E2400) vs 3.4 (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 offers 580% better value. The RADEON E2400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Mobility Radeon HD 2300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $15-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | 3.4+580% |
| Codename | Lexa | Broadway |
| Release | April 20 2017 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #773 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON E2400 and Mobility Radeon HD 2300
