RADEON E2400
Radeon X1050
RADEON E2400 vs Radeon X1050 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RADEON E2400 vs Radeon X1050 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RADEON E2400 vs Radeon X1050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RADEON E2400
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon X1050
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON E2400 vs Radeon X1050 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
RADEON E2400
The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.
Radeon X1050
The Radeon X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON E2400 scores 52 versus the Radeon X1050's 49 — the RADEON E2400 leads by 6.1%. The RADEON E2400 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon X1050 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON E2400) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1050). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon X1050). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 2800 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 52+6% | 49 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS | 11.47 TFLOPS+1163% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 2800 MHz+149% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON E2400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1050 carries 256 MB. RADEON E2400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON E2400 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1050. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (RADEON E2400) vs 8 MB (Radeon X1050) — the Radeon X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON E2400 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1050's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The RADEON E2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON E2400) vs 350W (Radeon X1050). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-9% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 165mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0+11% | 0.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RADEON E2400 came in at $100, while the Radeon X1050 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon X1050 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (RADEON E2400) vs Infinity (Radeon X1050) — the Radeon X1050 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1050 (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | RADEON E2400 | Radeon X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | Lexa | Strix Halo |
| Release | April 20 2017 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #773 | #126 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON E2400 and Radeon X1050
