RADEON E2400 vs Radeon X1600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON E2400 vs Radeon X1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON E2400 vs Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON E2400

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 111.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 255W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1600

2020

Why buy it

✅RADEON E2400 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
99% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌410% higher power demand at 255W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON E2400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 6.1% in PassMark G3D (52 vs 49), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON E2400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 111.2% (0.5 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON E2400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1600 has the stronger long-term case.

RADEON E2400 vs Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON E2400

The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon X1600

The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON E2400 scores 52 versus the Radeon X1600's 49 — the RADEON E2400 leads by 6.1%. The RADEON E2400 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon X1600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON E2400) vs 4,608 (Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400) vs 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 2105 MHz.

Feature	RADEON E2400	Radeon X1600
G3D Mark Score	52+6%	49
Architecture	GCN 4.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	4608+1100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9085 TFLOPS	19.4 TFLOPS+2035%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	2105 MHz+87%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	24	288+1100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON E2400	Radeon X1600
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON E2400 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600.

Feature	RADEON E2400	Radeon X1600
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON E2400 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1600's 255W — a 134.4% difference. The RADEON E2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON E2400) vs 350W (Radeon X1600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON E2400	Radeon X1600
TDP	50W-80%	255W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	1.0+400%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RADEON E2400 came in at $100, while the Radeon X1600 launched at $199. On MSRP, RADEON E2400 was 49.7% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (RADEON E2400) vs 0.2 (Radeon X1600) — the RADEON E2400 offers 150% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 (2020 vs 2017).

Feature	RADEON E2400	Radeon X1600
MSRP	$100-50%	$199
Performance per Dollar	0.5+150%	0.2
Codename	Lexa	Navi 21
Release	April 20 2017	October 28 2020
Ranking	#773	#34

Search RADEON E2400 on Amazon

Search Radeon X1600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.