Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon HD 4250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon HD 4250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon HD 4250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 3300

2011

Why buy it

✅5.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Delivers 72.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌69.1% higher power demand at 186W vs 110W.

Radeon HD 4250

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 110W instead of 186W, a 76W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
66.7% HIGHER MSRP
$50 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 3300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (127 vs 123), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 3300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2011 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 3300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 72.1% (4.2 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon HD 4250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 3300

The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.

Radeon HD 4250

The Radeon HD 4250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 123 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 3300 scores 127 and the Radeon HD 4250 reaches 123 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3300 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 4250 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4250). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3300) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4250).

Feature	Radeon HD 3300	Radeon HD 4250
G3D Mark Score	127+3%	123
Architecture	TeraScale 3	TeraScale
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	1280+60%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.92 TFLOPS+92%	1 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L1 Cache	320 KB+100%	160 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 3300	Radeon HD 4250
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3300 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4250. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3300) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4250) — the Radeon HD 3300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 3300	Radeon HD 4250
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4250). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon HD 3300	Radeon HD 4250
DirectX	10.0	10.1
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Legacy (Radeon HD 3300) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4250). Decoder: UVD+ vs UVD 2.

Feature	Radeon HD 3300	Radeon HD 4250
Encoder	Legacy	UVD 2
Decoder	UVD+	UVD 2
Codecs	H.264/AVC,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3300 draws 186W versus the Radeon HD 4250's 110W — a 51.4% difference. The Radeon HD 4250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3300) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4250). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon HD 3300	Radeon HD 4250
TDP	186W	110W-41%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	—	1mm
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	0.7	1.1+57%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 3300 came in at $30, while the Radeon HD 4250 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 3300 was 40% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.2 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 2.5 (Radeon HD 4250) — the Radeon HD 3300 offers 68% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3300 (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Radeon HD 3300	Radeon HD 4250
MSRP	$30-40%	$50
Performance per Dollar	4.2+68%	2.5
Codename	Cayman	RV770
Release	December 1 2011	June 25 2008
Ranking	#598	#876

Search Radeon HD 3300 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.