Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon Xpress 1250

AMD

Radeon HD 3300

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Xpress 1250

2013Boost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon Xpress 1250 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon Xpress 1250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon Xpress 1250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 3300

2011

Why buy it

  • 200.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 186.2% higher power demand at 186W vs 65W.

Radeon Xpress 1250

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 186W, a 121W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 3300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 200.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 195.3% in PassMark G3D (127 vs 43), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 3300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon HD 3300 vs Radeon Xpress 1250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 3300

The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

Radeon Xpress 1250

The Radeon Xpress 1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points. Launch price was $89.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3300 scores 127 versus the Radeon Xpress 1250's 43 — the Radeon HD 3300 leads by 195.3%. The Radeon HD 3300 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon Xpress 1250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 384 (Radeon Xpress 1250). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3300) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1250).

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Radeon Xpress 1250
G3D Mark Score
127+195%
43
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280+233%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.92 TFLOPS+138%
0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+233%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+233%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Radeon Xpress 1250
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3300 and 64-bit on the Radeon Xpress 1250. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3300) vs 256 KB (Radeon Xpress 1250) — the Radeon HD 3300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Radeon Xpress 1250
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 3300) vs 9_0b (Radeon Xpress 1250). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Radeon Xpress 1250
DirectX
10.0+11%
9_0b
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Legacy (Radeon HD 3300) vs Avivo (Radeon Xpress 1250). Decoder: UVD+ vs Avivo.

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Radeon Xpress 1250
Encoder
Legacy
Avivo
Decoder
UVD+
Avivo
Codecs
H.264/AVC,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3300 draws 186W versus the Radeon Xpress 1250's 65W — a 96.4% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3300) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1250). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Radeon Xpress 1250
TDP
186W
65W-65%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
0.7
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 3300 came in at $30, while the Radeon Xpress 1250 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Xpress 1250 was 100+% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.2 (Radeon HD 3300) vs Infinity (Radeon Xpress 1250) — the Radeon Xpress 1250 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Xpress 1250 (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon HD 3300Radeon Xpress 1250
MSRP
$30
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
4.2
Infinity
Codename
Cayman
Oland
Release
December 1 2011
October 8 2013
Ranking
#598
#871

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.