Radeon HD 3650 AGP vs Radeon HD 6320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP vs Radeon HD 6320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP vs Radeon HD 6320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 186W, a 141W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6320 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
166.7% HIGHER MSRP
$80 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6320

2011

Why buy it

✅10.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Delivers 161.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌313.3% higher power demand at 186W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6320 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 3650 AGP instead at 150 vs 147, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 3650 AGP is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6320 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $80, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 161.3% (4.9 vs 1.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6320 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 3650 AGP has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP vs Radeon HD 6320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 3650 AGP

The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 150 points.

Radeon HD 6320

The Radeon HD 6320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 3650 AGP scores 150 and the Radeon HD 6320 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 6320 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320).

Feature	Radeon HD 3650 AGP	Radeon HD 6320
G3D Mark Score	150+2%	147
Architecture	TeraScale 2	TeraScale 3
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	480	1280+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.576 TFLOPS	1.92 TFLOPS+233%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L1 Cache	48 KB	320 KB+567%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 3650 AGP	Radeon HD 6320
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3650 AGP and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6320. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6320) — the Radeon HD 6320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 3650 AGP	Radeon HD 6320
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3650 AGP draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 6320's 186W — a 122.1% difference. The Radeon HD 3650 AGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6320). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon HD 3650 AGP	Radeon HD 6320
TDP	45W-76%	186W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	3.3+313%	0.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 3650 AGP came in at $80, while the Radeon HD 6320 launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6320 was 62.5% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Radeon HD 3650 AGP) vs 4.9 (Radeon HD 6320) — the Radeon HD 6320 offers 157.9% better value.

Feature	Radeon HD 3650 AGP	Radeon HD 6320
MSRP	$80	$30-63%
Performance per Dollar	1.9	4.9+158%
Codename	Onega	Cayman
Release	April 19 2011	December 1 2011
Ranking	#926	#598

Search Radeon HD 3650 AGP on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.