RADEON IGP 320 vs Radeon IGP 340M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON IGP 320 is positioned at rank 424 and the Radeon IGP 340M is on rank 414, so the Radeon IGP 340M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 320

#409

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

369325%

#424

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

100%

#425

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

50%

#426

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

25%

#427

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon IGP 340M

#398

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

147730%

#413

GRID RTX6000-2Q

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500

100%

#414

Radeon IGP 340M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#416

GRID M60-0B

MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900

90%

#417

Quadro FX 4500 X2

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

80%

#418

Quadro FX 5500

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30

80%

#419

Quadro FX 1000

MSRP: $500|Avg: $30

70%

#420

Quadro FX 3400/4400

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50

60%

#421

Quadro FX 1300

MSRP: $599|Avg: $15

60%

#422

Quadro FX 4000

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50

50%

#423

RADEON IGP 320

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

40%

#424

Quadro FX 500/FX 600

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

20%

#425

Quadro FX 2000

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $40

10%

#426

GRID V100-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

0%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON IGP 320 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon IGP 340M.

Insight	RADEON IGP 320	Radeon IGP 340M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON IGP 320 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON IGP 320 Benchmark Check

Radeon IGP 340M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON IGP 320 and Radeon IGP 340M

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Radeon IGP 340M

The Radeon IGP 340M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 852 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON IGP 320 scores 4 versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 3 — the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON IGP 320 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon IGP 340M uses GCN 5.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 3,584 (Radeon IGP 340M). Raw compute: 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 340M). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	Radeon IGP 340M
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 5.0
Process Node	7 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4608+29%	3584
Compute (TFLOPS)	20.28 TFLOPS+89%	10.75 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2200 MHz+47%	1500 MHz
ROPs	128+100%	64
TMUs	288+29%	224
L1 Cache	1 MB+14%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	Radeon IGP 340M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	RADEON IGP 320	Radeon IGP 340M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON IGP 320 draws 300W versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 230W — a 26.4% difference. The Radeon IGP 340M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON IGP 320) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 340M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.