GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs RADEON IGP 320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs RADEON IGP 320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs RADEON IGP 320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce4 Ti 4800

2010

Why buy it

✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
299% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

RADEON IGP 320

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 166% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅GeForce4 Ti 4800 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON IGP 320 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4 vs 6).
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce4 Ti 4800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 50% in PassMark G3D (6 vs 4), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON IGP 320 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, 72 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON IGP 320 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 166% (0.0 vs 0.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce4 Ti 4800 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 vs RADEON IGP 320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce4 Ti 4800

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 scores 6 versus the RADEON IGP 320's 4 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 leads by 50%. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is built on Fermi while the RADEON IGP 320 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320). Raw compute: 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320).

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4800	RADEON IGP 320
G3D Mark Score	6+50%	4
Architecture	Fermi	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	480	4608+860%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.345 TFLOPS	20.28 TFLOPS+1408%
ROPs	48	128+167%
TMUs	60	288+380%
L1 Cache	0.94 MB	1 MB+6%
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	4 MB+433%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON IGP 320 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4800	RADEON IGP 320
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 320. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4800	RADEON IGP 320
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	4 MB+433%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 draws 250W versus the RADEON IGP 320's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4800	RADEON IGP 320
TDP	250W-17%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	216mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce4 Ti 4800 came in at $399, while the RADEON IGP 320 launched at $100. On MSRP, RADEON IGP 320 was 74.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) vs 0.0 (RADEON IGP 320) — the RADEON IGP 320 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is RADEON IGP 320 (2021 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce4 Ti 4800	RADEON IGP 320
MSRP	$399	$100-75%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.0
Codename	GF100	Navi 21
Release	March 26 2010	November 4 2021
Ranking	#488	#136

Search GeForce4 Ti 4800 on Amazon

Search RADEON IGP 320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.