RADEON IGP 320 vs RADEON IGP 345M

AMD

RADEON IGP 320

2021Core: 1825 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

RADEON IGP 345M

2016Core: 855 MHz
Similar parts
······

RADEON IGP 320 vs RADEON IGP 345M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON IGP 320 vs RADEON IGP 345M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON IGP 320 vs RADEON IGP 345M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON IGP 320

2021

Why buy it

  • +33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • RADEON IGP 345M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON IGP 320 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 757.1% higher power demand at 300W vs 35W.

RADEON IGP 345M

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 300W, a 265W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON IGP 320 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON IGP 320 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 14nm, 72 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON IGP 320 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

RADEON IGP 320 vs RADEON IGP 345M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

RADEON IGP 320

The RADEON IGP 320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 4 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

AMD

RADEON IGP 345M

The RADEON IGP 345M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON IGP 320 scores 4 versus the RADEON IGP 345M's 3 — the RADEON IGP 320 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON IGP 320 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RADEON IGP 345M uses GCN 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (RADEON IGP 320) vs 768 (RADEON IGP 345M). Raw compute: 20.28 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 320) vs 1.313 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 345M).

FeatureRADEON IGP 320RADEON IGP 345M
G3D Mark Score
4+33%
3
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
7 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
4608+500%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
20.28 TFLOPS+1445%
1.313 TFLOPS
ROPs
128+700%
16
TMUs
288+500%
48
L1 Cache
1 MB+426%
0.19 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON IGP 320RADEON IGP 345M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 320 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 345M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON IGP 320) vs 1 MB (RADEON IGP 345M) — the RADEON IGP 320 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRADEON IGP 320RADEON IGP 345M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON IGP 320 draws 300W versus the RADEON IGP 345M's 35W — a 158.2% difference. The RADEON IGP 345M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON IGP 320) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 345M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureRADEON IGP 320RADEON IGP 345M
TDP
300W
35W-88%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON IGP 320 (2021 vs 2016).

FeatureRADEON IGP 320RADEON IGP 345M
MSRP
$100
Codename
Navi 21
Baffin
Release
November 4 2021
October 30 2016
Ranking
#136
#577

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.