GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon Pro 570

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 960

2015Core: 1127 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 570

2017Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1105 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 960

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 45.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Draws 100W instead of 120W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 50.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 20% higher power demand at 120W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro 570 better than GeForce GTX 960?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,133 vs 6,337 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro 570 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 960 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Pro 570 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro 570 is about 50.8% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and you are getting 3.3% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 960 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does GeForce GTX 960 make more sense than Radeon Pro 570?
Yes. GeForce GTX 960 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (100W vs 120W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $199 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro 570. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro 570 currently gives you 3.3% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 960 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 960Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low103 FPS78 FPS
medium87 FPS67 FPS
high72 FPS55 FPS
ultra42 FPS36 FPS
1440p
low90 FPS69 FPS
medium77 FPS60 FPS
high56 FPS43 FPS
ultra32 FPS27 FPS
4K
low28 FPS25 FPS
medium26 FPS24 FPS
high18 FPS15 FPS
ultra15 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 960Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low139 FPS158 FPS
medium109 FPS123 FPS
high88 FPS91 FPS
ultra53 FPS65 FPS
1440p
low77 FPS110 FPS
medium57 FPS82 FPS
high42 FPS63 FPS
ultra28 FPS46 FPS
4K
low27 FPS56 FPS
medium19 FPS44 FPS
high16 FPS35 FPS
ultra11 FPS25 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 960Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low276 FPS285 FPS
medium221 FPS228 FPS
high184 FPS190 FPS
ultra138 FPS143 FPS
1440p
low207 FPS214 FPS
medium166 FPS171 FPS
high138 FPS143 FPS
ultra103 FPS107 FPS
4K
low138 FPS143 FPS
medium110 FPS114 FPS
high92 FPS95 FPS
ultra69 FPS71 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 960Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low168 FPS153 FPS
medium139 FPS126 FPS
high125 FPS110 FPS
ultra101 FPS93 FPS
1440p
low117 FPS112 FPS
medium99 FPS93 FPS
high89 FPS82 FPS
ultra70 FPS68 FPS
4K
low68 FPS66 FPS
medium55 FPS53 FPS
high45 FPS42 FPS
ultra32 FPS32 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon Pro 570

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 960

The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Radeon Pro 570

The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1105 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 960Radeon Pro 570
G3D Mark Score
6,133
6,337+3%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1024
1792+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.413 TFLOPS
3.96 TFLOPS+64%
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+7%
1105 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
112+75%
L1 Cache
384 KB
448 KB+17%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 960 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 960Radeon Pro 570
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 960Radeon Pro 570
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 960 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 960Radeon Pro 570
TDP
100W-17%
120W
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75 C
Perf/Watt
61.3+16%
52.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 960 costs 33.7% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the GeForce GTX 960 offers 46% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 960Radeon Pro 570
MSRP
$199-34%
$300
Performance per Dollar
30.8+46%
21.1
Codename
GM206
Polaris 20
Release
January 22 2015
June 5 2017
Ranking
#393
#382