
GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 120W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50.8% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 120W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.8 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 120W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50.8% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 120W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 570 better than GeForce GTX 960?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 960 make more sense than Radeon Pro 570?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 71 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon Pro 570

GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133 | 6,337+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1792+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 3.96 TFLOPS+64% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+7% | 1105 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 448 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 960 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 960 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-17% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3+16% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 960 costs 33.7% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the GeForce GTX 960 offers 46% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-34% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8+46% | 21.1 |
| Codename | GM206 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | January 22 2015 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #393 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













