Radeon Pro 570 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU

AMD

Radeon Pro 570

2017Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1105 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A500 Embedded GPU

2022Core: 435 MHzBoost: 1335 MHz
Similar parts
··

Radeon Pro 570 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 570 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 570 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

  • 3.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 500% higher power demand at 120W vs 20W.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 20W instead of 120W, a 100W reduction.
  • More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 570 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (6,337 vs 6,197), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 14nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 570 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 570 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX A500 Embedded GPU has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro 570 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro 570

The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A500 Embedded GPU

The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 570 scores 6,337 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU reaches 6,197 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1105 MHz vs 1335 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro 570RTX A500 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score
6,337+2%
6,197
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Ampere
Process Node
14 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
1792
2048+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.96 TFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS+38%
Boost Clock
1105 MHz
1335 MHz+21%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112+75%
64
L1 Cache
0.44 MB
2 MB+355%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A500 Embedded GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 570 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureRadeon Pro 570RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 570 and 128-bit on the RTX A500 Embedded GPU.

FeatureRadeon Pro 570RTX A500 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 570 draws 120W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 142.9% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 570) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro 570RTX A500 Embedded GPU
TDP
120W
20W-83%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
82mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
52.8
309.9+487%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX A500 Embedded GPU (2022 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon Pro 570RTX A500 Embedded GPU
MSRP
$300
Codename
Polaris 20
GA107S
Release
June 5 2017
March 30 2022
Ranking
#382
#389

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.