Radeon Pro SSG vs Tesla M40

AMD

Radeon Pro SSG

2016Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M40

2015Core: 948 MHzBoost: 1112 MHz
Similar parts
·

Radeon Pro SSG vs Tesla M40 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro SSG vs Tesla M40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro SSG

2016

Why buy it

  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 180% HIGHER MSRP
    $6,999 MSRPvs$2,500 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Tesla M40

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $4,499 less on MSRP ($2,500 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 160.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro SSG is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 7.4% in PassMark G3D (10,972 vs 10,220), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro SSG is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tesla M40 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,499 cheaper on MSRP at $2,500 vs $6,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 160.8% (4.1 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla M40 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro SSG has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro SSG vs Tesla M40 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro SSG

The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.

NVIDIA

Tesla M40

The Tesla M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,220 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro SSG scores 10,972 versus the Tesla M40's 10,220 — the Radeon Pro SSG leads by 7.4%. The Radeon Pro SSG is built on GCN 3.0 while the Tesla M40 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1112 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGTesla M40
G3D Mark Score
10,972+7%
10,220
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4096+33%
3072
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.602 TFLOPS+26%
6.832 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1112 MHz+6%
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
256+33%
192
L1 Cache
1 MB
1.1 MB+10%
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGTesla M40
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro SSG and 256-bit on the Tesla M40. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40) — the Radeon Pro SSG has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGTesla M40
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 12.0 (Tesla M40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGTesla M40
DirectX
12.1
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
6
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M40). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Tesla M40).

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGTesla M40
Encoder
VCE 4.0
NVENC 2.0 (2x)
Decoder
UVD 7.0
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro SSG draws 260W versus the Tesla M40's 250W — a 3.9% difference. The Tesla M40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 500W (Tesla M40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGTesla M40
TDP
260W
250W-4%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
42.2+3%
40.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro SSG came in at $6999, while the Tesla M40 launched at $2500. On MSRP, Tesla M40 was 64.3% cheaper ($4499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 4.1 (Tesla M40) — the Tesla M40 offers 156.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro SSG (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGTesla M40
MSRP
$6999
$2500-64%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
4.1+156%
Codename
Fiji
GM200
Release
July 26 2016
November 10 2015
Ranking
#249
#256

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.