Radeon PRO V710 vs Quadro M6000
Radeon PRO V710
Popular choices:
Quadro M6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO V710
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO V710 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2015). The Radeon PRO V710 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO V710 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO V710 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M6000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $500 versus $2,000 for the Radeon PRO V710, it costs 75% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 292.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO V710 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+292.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) | ✅More affordable ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 and Quadro M6000
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 scores 12,000 and the Quadro M6000 reaches 11,769 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro M6000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000). Raw compute: 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,000+2% | 11,769 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3456+13% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 27.65 TFLOPS+304% | 6.844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+80% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 216+13% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.1 MB+47% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO V710 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 has 12 GB. The Quadro M6000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000) — the Quadro M6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 draws 158W versus the Quadro M6000's 250W — a 45.1% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710) vs 500W (Quadro M6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W-37% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 75.9+61% | 47.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the Quadro M6000 launched at $4999 and now averages $500. The Quadro M6000 costs 75% less ($1500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 23.5 (Quadro M6000) — the Quadro M6000 offers 291.7% better value. The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-60% | $4999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | $500-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 23.5+292% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | GM200 |
| Release | October 3 2024 | March 21 2015 |
| Ranking | #196 | #228 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO V710 and Quadro M6000
