Radeon PRO V710 vs Arc A580
Radeon PRO V710
Popular choices:
Arc A580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO V710
Performance Per Dollar Arc A580
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO V710.
| Insight | Radeon PRO V710 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (271mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc A580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $179 versus $2,000 for the Radeon PRO V710, it costs 91% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1022.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO V710 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1022.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) | ✅More affordable ($179) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 and Arc A580
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Arc A580
The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 scores 12,000 and the Arc A580 reaches 12,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Arc A580 uses Generation 12.7, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 3,072 (Arc A580). Raw compute: 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 54 RT cores (Radeon PRO V710) vs 24 (Arc A580) vs 384.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,000 | 12,060 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3456+13% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 27.65 TFLOPS+125% | 12.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 216+13% | 192 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 54+125% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) vs 8 MB (Arc A580) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A580). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 draws 158W versus the Arc A580's 175W — a 10.2% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710) vs 600W (Arc A580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 271mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W-10% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 271mm |
| Height | 111mm | 132mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 75.9+10% | 68.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the Arc A580 launched at $179 and now averages $179. The Arc A580 costs 91% less ($1821 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 67.4 (Arc A580) — the Arc A580 offers 1023.3% better value. The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $179-91% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | $179-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 67.4+1023% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | DG2-512 |
| Release | October 3 2024 | October 10 2023 |
| Ranking | #196 | #223 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO V710 and Arc A580
