Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc Pro B50
Radeon PRO V710
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO V710
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B50
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO V710.
| Insight | Radeon PRO V710 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Intel Arc Pro B50 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $349 versus $2,000 for the Radeon PRO V710, it costs 83% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 483% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO V710 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+483%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) | ✅More affordable ($349) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 and Intel Arc Pro B50
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 scores 12,000 and the Intel Arc Pro B50 reaches 12,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 54 RT cores (Radeon PRO V710) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,000 | 12,208+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3456+69% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 27.65 TFLOPS+160% | 10.65 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2600 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 216+69% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 54+238% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 draws 158W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 77.2% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W | 70W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 75.9 | 174.4+130% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349 and now averages $349. The Intel Arc Pro B50 costs 82.5% less ($1651 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 offers 483.3% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $349-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | $349-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 35.0+483% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | October 3 2024 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #196 | #221 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO V710 and Intel Arc Pro B50
