
Radeon Pro Vega 64

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon PRO W6600X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon PRO W6600X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon PRO W6600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅28.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌16.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon PRO W6600X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro Vega 64
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 12,891 and the Radeon PRO W6600X reaches 13,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 2479 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,891 | 13,113+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+100% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.06 TFLOPS+9% | 10.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 2479 MHz+84% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+100% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600X carries 8 GB. Radeon PRO W6600X gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600X. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 70.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 120W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 51.6 | 109.3+112% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro Vega 64 came in at $599, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 64 was 14.3% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers 14.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6600X (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-14% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5+14% | 18.8 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 23 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #202 | #197 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














