
Radeon Pro Vega 64

Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon RX Vega 56: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 56 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50.1% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.5 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅18.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.6 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro Vega 64 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX Vega 56 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro Vega 64
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

Radeon RX Vega 56
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 12,891 and the Radeon RX Vega 56 reaches 13,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1471 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,891 | 13,026+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+14% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.06 TFLOPS+5% | 10.54 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1471 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+14% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+14% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX Vega 56 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64 and 2048-bit on the Radeon RX Vega 56.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 2048-bit+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 17.4% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 210W-16% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 51.6 | 62.0+20% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro Vega 64 came in at $599, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 56 was 33.4% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 32.6 (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 51.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $399-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5 | 32.6+52% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #202 | #199 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














