Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon RX Vega 56

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017Core: 1250 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 56

2017Core: 1156 MHzBoost: 1471 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon RX Vega 56: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 56 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.5 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Radeon RX Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

  • 18.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 51.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.6 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon Pro Vega 64 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX Vega 56 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (13,026 vs 12,891), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX Vega 56 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 51.7% (32.6 vs 21.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 56

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 12,891 and the Radeon RX Vega 56 reaches 13,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1471 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon RX Vega 56
G3D Mark Score
12,891
13,026+1%
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
4096+14%
3584
Compute (TFLOPS)
11.06 TFLOPS+5%
10.54 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1471 MHz+9%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
256+14%
224
L1 Cache
1 MB+14%
0.88 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon RX Vega 56
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX Vega 56 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64 and 2048-bit on the Radeon RX Vega 56.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon RX Vega 56
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM2
Bus Width
128-bit
2048-bit+1500%
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon RX Vega 56
DirectX
12.1
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon RX Vega 56
Encoder
VCE 4.0
VCE 4.0
Decoder
UVD 7.0
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 17.4% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon RX Vega 56
TDP
250W
210W-16%
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
650W
Power Connector
Integrated
2x 8-pin
Length
267mm
280mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
51.6
62.0+20%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro Vega 64 came in at $599, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 56 was 33.4% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 32.6 (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 51.6% better value.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon RX Vega 56
MSRP
$599
$399-33%
Performance per Dollar
21.5
32.6+52%
Codename
Vega 10
Vega 10
Release
June 27 2017
August 14 2017
Ranking
#202
#199

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.