Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017Core: 1250 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

2017Core: 1382 MHzBoost: 1600 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 68.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 12.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Vega Frontier Edition across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

2017

Why buy it

  • 4.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • 20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro Vega 64 instead at 12,891 vs 12,753, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro Vega 64 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro Vega 64 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $400 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 68.6% (21.5 vs 12.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Vega Frontier Edition still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

AMD

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1382 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,753 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 12,891 and the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition reaches 12,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 4,096 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 13.11 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1600 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
G3D Mark Score
12,891+1%
12,753
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
4096
4096
Compute (TFLOPS)
11.06 TFLOPS
13.11 TFLOPS+19%
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1600 MHz+19%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
256
256
L1 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64 and System on the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.1 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Encoder
VCE 4.0
VCE 4.0
Decoder
UVD 7.0
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 draws 250W versus the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 1W (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 268mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
TDP
250W-17%
300W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Length
267mm
268mm
Height
111mm
105mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
51.6+21%
42.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro Vega 64 came in at $599, while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition launched at $999. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 64 was 40% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.8 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers 68% better value.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 64Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
MSRP
$599-40%
$999
Performance per Dollar
21.5+68%
12.8
Codename
Vega 10
Vega 10
Release
June 27 2017
June 27 2017
Ranking
#202
#203

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.