G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon RX 6800M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon RX 6800M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌72.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 145W.

Radeon RX 6800M

2021

Why buy it

✅46.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 145W instead of 250W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 6800M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 46.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (13,295 vs 12,891), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6800M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon Pro Vega 64 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, and 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 6800M makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $599 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3.1% (22.2 vs 21.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon RX 6800M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

Radeon RX 6800M

The Radeon RX 6800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2116 MHz to 2390 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 145W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,295 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 12,891 and the Radeon RX 6800M reaches 13,295 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 6800M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6800M). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.24 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800M). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 2390 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon RX 6800M
G3D Mark Score	12,891	13,295+3%
Architecture	GCN 5.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4096+60%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.06 TFLOPS	12.24 TFLOPS+11%
Boost Clock	1350 MHz	2390 MHz+77%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	256+60%	160
L1 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6800M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon RX 6800M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800M carries 12 GB. Radeon RX 6800M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64 and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 6800M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6800M) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon RX 6800M
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6800M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon RX 6800M
DirectX	12.1	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6800M). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800M).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon RX 6800M
Encoder	VCE 4.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	UVD 7.0	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6800M's 145W — a 53.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6800M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6800M). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon RX 6800M
TDP	250W	145W-42%
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	500W
Power Connector	Integrated	Mobile
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	51.6	91.7+78%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro Vega 64 came in at $599, while the Radeon RX 6800M launched at $599. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 22.2 (Radeon RX 6800M) — the Radeon RX 6800M offers 3.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6800M (2021 vs 2017).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon RX 6800M
MSRP	$599	$599
Performance per Dollar	21.5	22.2+3%
Codename	Vega 10	Navi 22
Release	June 27 2017	May 31 2021
Ranking	#202	#193

Search Radeon Pro Vega 64 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6800M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.