G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon PRO W7500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon PRO W7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
39.6% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.5 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅21.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 44% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.0 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W7500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (13,298 vs 12,891), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W7500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $170 cheaper on MSRP at $429 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 44% (31.0 vs 21.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon PRO W7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 12,891 and the Radeon PRO W7500 reaches 13,298 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1700 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7500
G3D Mark Score	12,891	13,298+3%
Architecture	GCN 5.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	4096+129%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.06 TFLOPS	12.19 TFLOPS+10%
Boost Clock	1350 MHz	1700 MHz+26%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	256+129%	112
L1 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7500
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 carries 8 GB. Radeon PRO W7500 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7500. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7500
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7500
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7500
Encoder	VCE 4.0	VCN 4.0
Decoder	UVD 7.0	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7500
TDP	250W	70W-72%
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	500W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	216mm
Height	111mm	115mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	51.6	190.0+268%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro Vega 64 came in at $599, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W7500 was 28.4% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Radeon PRO W7500 offers 44.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7500 (2023 vs 2017).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP	$599	$429-28%
Performance per Dollar	21.5	31.0+44%
Codename	Vega 10	Navi 33
Release	June 27 2017	August 3 2023
Ranking	#202	#192

Search Radeon Pro Vega 64 on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W7500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.