G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 471.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.5 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 250W instead of 400W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021

Why buy it

✅59.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
484.1% HIGHER MSRP
$3,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 21.5 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 400W vs 250W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 59.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (13,182 vs 12,891), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, 602 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro Vega 64 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,900 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $3,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 471.2% (21.5 vs 3.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Radeon Pro Vega 64 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro Vega 64

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 12,891 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1967 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
G3D Mark Score	12,891	13,182+2%
Architecture	GCN 5.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4096+7%	3840 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.06 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS ×2+37%
Boost Clock	1350 MHz	1967 MHz+46%
ROPs	64	96 ×2+50%
TMUs	256+7%	240 ×2
L1 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot carries 8 GB. Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64 and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Encoder	VCE 4.0	VCN 4.0 (2x)
Decoder	UVD 7.0	VCN 4.0 (2x)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
TDP	250W-38%	400W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	500W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	280mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	85°C
Perf/Watt	51.6+56%	33.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro Vega 64 came in at $599, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 64 was 82.9% cheaper ($2900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.5 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers 465.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot (2021 vs 2017).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 64	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP	$599-83%	$3499
Performance per Dollar	21.5+466%	3.8
Codename	Vega 10	Navi 21
Release	June 27 2017	August 3 2021
Ranking	#202	#157

Search Radeon Pro Vega 64 on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.