Radeon Pro W5700 vs Quadro RTX 4000
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5700
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro W5700.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro RTX 4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $220 versus $300 for the Radeon Pro W5700, it costs 27% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 41.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+41.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($220) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and Quadro RTX 4000
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the Quadro RTX 4000 reaches 14,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro RTX 4000 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,380 | 14,925+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.893 TFLOPS+25% | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1930 MHz+25% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the Quadro RTX 4000's 160W — a 24.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 160W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1 | 93.3+33% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Quadro RTX 4000 launched at $899 and now averages $220. The Quadro RTX 4000 costs 26.7% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 47.9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 67.8 (Quadro RTX 4000) — the Quadro RTX 4000 offers 41.5% better value. The Radeon Pro W5700 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-11% | $899 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $220-27% |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.9 | 67.8+42% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | TU104 |
| Release | November 19 2019 | November 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #163 | #154 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro W5700 and Quadro RTX 4000
