
Radeon Pro W5700 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5700
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro W5700.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,832 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) reaches 14,832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 3.037 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,380 | 14,832+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+157% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.893 TFLOPS+193% | 3.037 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1930 MHz+14% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+157% | 56 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5700 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)'s 18W — a 167.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 18W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1 | 824.0+1075% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | — |
| Codename | Navi 10 | TU117 |
| Release | November 19 2019 | December 2 2020 |
| Ranking | #163 | #548 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















