CPU
GPU
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5700
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro W5700.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-15.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+15.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $300 for the Radeon Pro W5700, it costs 17% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 38.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+38.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and Radeon RX 7600
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 15.3%. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,380 | 16,581+15% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.893 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+145% |
| Boost Clock | 1930 MHz | 2655 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+13% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 21.6% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 165W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1 | 100.5+43% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 16.7% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 47.9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 38.4% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $269-66% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $250-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.9 | 66.3+38% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 33 |
| Release | November 19 2019 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #163 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro W5700 and Radeon RX 7600
