CPU
GPU
Radeon PRO W7700
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3080
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7700
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3080
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3080 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W7700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (10 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $400 versus $999 for the Radeon PRO W7700, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 171.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+171.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) | ✅More affordable ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7700 and GeForce RTX 3080
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
GeForce RTX 3080
The GeForce RTX 3080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 8704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,071 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7700 scores 23,062 versus the GeForce RTX 3080's 25,071 — the GeForce RTX 3080 leads by 8.7%. The Radeon PRO W7700 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3080 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 8,704 (GeForce RTX 3080). Raw compute: 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 29.77 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3080). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1710 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 68 (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 272.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,062 | 25,071+9% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 8704+183% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.95 TFLOPS+7% | 29.77 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+52% | 1710 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192 | 272+42% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 8.5 MB+1033% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 5 MB+150% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 68+42% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7700 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3080 has 10 GB. The Radeon PRO W7700 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 760 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3080) — a 75.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3080. Bus width: 192-bit vs 320-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 5 MB (GeForce RTX 3080) — the GeForce RTX 3080 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+60% | 10 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 760 GB/s+76% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 320-bit+67% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 5 MB+150% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3080). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3080). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3080).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7700 draws 190W versus the GeForce RTX 3080's 320W — a 51% difference. The Radeon PRO W7700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 3080). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W-41% | 320W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-27% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 121.4+55% | 78.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $999, while the GeForce RTX 3080 launched at $699 and now averages $400. The GeForce RTX 3080 costs 60% less ($599 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 62.7 (GeForce RTX 3080) — the GeForce RTX 3080 offers 171.4% better value. The Radeon PRO W7700 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 3080 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $699-30% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $999 | $400-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1 | 62.7+171% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | GA102 |
| Release | November 13 2023 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #52 | #41 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7700 and GeForce RTX 3080
