CPU
GPU
Radeon PRO W7700
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX A6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7700
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX A6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro RTX A6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7700 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon PRO W7700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $999 versus $3,500 for the Quadro RTX A6000, it costs 71% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 254.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7700 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+254.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($999) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7700 and Quadro RTX A6000
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7700 scores 23,062 and the Quadro RTX A6000 reaches 22,798 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7700 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 84 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 336.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,062+1% | 22,798 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 10752+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.95 TFLOPS | 38.71 TFLOPS+21% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+44% | 1800 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 112+17% |
| TMUs | 192 | 336+75% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 10.5 MB+1300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 84+75% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7700 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 77.8% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 48 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 768 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7700 draws 190W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 44.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W7700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W-37% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 121.4+60% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $999, while the Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649 and now averages $3500. The Radeon PRO W7700 costs 71.5% less ($2501 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 6.5 (Quadro RTX A6000) — the Radeon PRO W7700 offers 255.4% better value. The Radeon PRO W7700 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-79% | $4649 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $999-71% | $3500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1+255% | 6.5 |
| Codename | Navi 32 | GA102 |
| Release | November 13 2023 | October 5 2020 |
| Ranking | #52 | #54 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7700 and Quadro RTX A6000
