CPU
GPU
Radeon PRO W7700
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7700
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $429 versus $999 for the Radeon PRO W7700, it costs 57% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 129.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+129.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) | ✅More affordable ($429) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7700 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2407 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,770 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7700 scores 23,062 and the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB reaches 22,770 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7700 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB). Raw compute: 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 23.7 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 2572 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 36 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) vs 144.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,062+1% | 22,770 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4608+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.95 TFLOPS+35% | 23.7 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+1% | 2572 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+33% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4.5 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+33% | 36 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 448 GB/s+4% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7700 draws 190W versus the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB's 180W — a 5.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 68°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 180W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 68°C-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 121.4 | 126.5+4% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $999, while the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB launched at $429 and now averages $429. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB costs 57.1% less ($570 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 53.1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB offers 129.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $429-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $999 | $429-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1 | 53.1+130% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | GB206 |
| Release | November 13 2023 | April 16 2025 |
| Ranking | #52 | #55 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7700 and GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
