Radeon Pro WX 2100
VS
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017Core: 925 MHzBoost: 1219 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022Core: 1515 MHzBoost: 1755 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is positioned at rank #118 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 2100

#62
RTX A4500
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800
99%
#63
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000
99%
#64
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547
96%
#65
RTX A4000H
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927
94%
#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
87%
#103
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1176%
#118
Radeon Pro WX 2100
MSRP: $149|Avg: $45
100%
#119
CMP 40HX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $120
100%
#124
Radeon Pro W5500X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
98%
#125
Quadro T2000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $75
97%
#130
FirePro D300
MSRP: $500|Avg: $20
91%
#131
Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
88%
#132
Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
106%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
102%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
101%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
101%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
101%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
100%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
99%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
98%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
97%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
97%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
96%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
94%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
94%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
94%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
93%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
92%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
91%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
91%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
90%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 535.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX 2100.

InsightRadeon Pro WX 2100GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-535.6%)
Leading raw performance (+535.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $45), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 90.7% better value per dollar than the Radeon Pro WX 2100.

InsightRadeon Pro WX 2100GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+90.7%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($45)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 2100 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 scores 1,871 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 535.6%. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1219 MHz vs 1755 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
G3D Mark Score
1,871
11,892+536%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Ampere
Process Node
14 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
512
2560+400%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.248 TFLOPS
8.986 TFLOPS+620%
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1755 MHz+44%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L1 Cache
0.13 MB
2.5 MB+1823%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
8 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Encoder
VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
UVD 6.3
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 115.2% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 235mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
TDP
35W-73%
130W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
168mm
235mm
Height
69mm
124mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
53.5
91.5+71%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 costs 70% less ($105 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 90.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 2100GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP
$149-40%
$249
Avg Price (30d)
$45-70%
$150
Performance per Dollar
41.6
79.3+91%
Codename
Lexa
GA106
Release
June 4 2017
January 4 2022
Ranking
#702
#224