Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs GeForce GTX 465

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017Core: 1002 MHzBoost: 1053 MHz

GeForce GTX 465

2010Core: 607 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2,642

0.0%

2,654

+0.5%

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is positioned at rank #155 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

98%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

86%

#140

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1677%

#155

Radeon Pro WX 4150

MSRP: $300|Avg: $120

100%

#158

Quadro M2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $70

98%

#159

Quadro M4000

MSRP: $791|Avg: $350

96%

#160

FirePro W4100

MSRP: $183|Avg: $183

93%

#166

FirePro W5100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

85%

#167

Radeon Pro WX 4170

MSRP: $400|Avg: $120

81%

#168

FirePro W4300

MSRP: $379|Avg: $50

81%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

81%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon Pro WX 4150 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 465 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GeForce GTX 465
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 465 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $120), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 201.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GeForce GTX 465
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+201.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX 4150 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 465 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4150 and GeForce GTX 465

Radeon Pro WX 4150

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

GeForce GTX 465

The GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,654 points. Launch price was $279.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 scores 2,642 and the GeForce GTX 465 reaches 2,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 465 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 352 (GeForce GTX 465). Raw compute: 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 465).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GeForce GTX 465
G3D Mark Score	2,642	2,654
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Fermi
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896+155%	352
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.887 TFLOPS+121%	0.8554 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	56+27%	44
L1 Cache	224 KB	704 KB+214%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GeForce GTX 465
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 465 has 1 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 465) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GeForce GTX 465
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 465). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GeForce GTX 465
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs None (GeForce GTX 465). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 465).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GeForce GTX 465
Encoder	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)	None
Decoder	UVD 6.3	VP4
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 465's 200W — a 120% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GeForce GTX 465
TDP	50W-75%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	—	241mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85
Perf/Watt	52.8+297%	13.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the GeForce GTX 465 launched at $279 and now averages $40. The GeForce GTX 465 costs 66.7% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.0 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 66.3 (GeForce GTX 465) — the GeForce GTX 465 offers 201.4% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).