Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is positioned at rank 155 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is on rank 16, so the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

98%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

86%

#140

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1677%

#155

Radeon Pro WX 4150

MSRP: $300|Avg: $120

100%

#158

Quadro M2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $70

98%

#159

Quadro M4000

MSRP: $791|Avg: $350

96%

#160

FirePro W4100

MSRP: $183|Avg: $183

93%

#166

FirePro W5100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

85%

#167

Radeon Pro WX 4170

MSRP: $400|Avg: $120

81%

#168

FirePro W4300

MSRP: $379|Avg: $50

81%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

81%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

124%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

112%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

112%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

102%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

101%

#16

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 4150	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX 4150 Benchmark Check

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4150 and MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

Radeon Pro WX 4150

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 scores 2,642 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M reaches 2,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is built on GCN 4.0 while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score	2,642	2,637
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896+133%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.887 TFLOPS+98%	0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	224 KB	512 KB+129%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
DirectX	12 (12_0)+9%	11.0
OpenGL	4.6+10%	4.2
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Encoder	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)	PureVideo HD
Decoder	UVD 6.3	VP4
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 draws 50W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.