
Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Radeon RX 7600

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is positioned at rank #155 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 527.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX 4150.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-527.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+527.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $120), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 201.2% better value per dollar than the Radeon Pro WX 4150.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+201.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($120) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Radeon RX 7600

Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 scores 2,642 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 527.6%. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1053 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,642 | 16,581+528% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2048+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.887 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+1053% |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | 2655 MHz+152% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 56 | 128+129% |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 512 KB+129% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 107% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-70% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 100.5+90% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 costs 52% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.0 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 201.4% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $269-10% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-52% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0 | 66.3+201% |
| Codename | Baffin | Navi 33 |
| Release | March 1 2017 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #620 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















