Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is positioned at rank #155 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs uses modern memory architecture. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 80 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,715 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 scores 2,642 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs reaches 2,715 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 80 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Boost clocks: 1053 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,642 | 2,715+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+1020% | 80 |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | 1350 MHz+28% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs Quick Sync Video (Gen 12). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | Quick Sync Video (Gen 12) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 draws 50W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs's 28W — a 56.4% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 0W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 28W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 97.0+84% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs costs 100+% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.0 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs Infinity (Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Baffin | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | March 1 2017 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #620 | #584 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
