
Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Radeon Pro 450

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is positioned at rank #155 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $120), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 209.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+209.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Radeon Pro 450

Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 scores 2,642 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,642 | 2,723+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+40% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.887 TFLOPS+84% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+40% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 35W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 77.8+47% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0 and now averages $40. The Radeon Pro 450 costs 66.7% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.0 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 68.1 (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers 209.5% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $40-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0 | 68.1+210% |
| Codename | Baffin | Baffin |
| Release | March 1 2017 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #620 | #612 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















