Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Quadro K4000
Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:
Quadro K4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is positioned at rank 155 and the Quadro K4000 is on rank 283, so the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K4000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $120), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 23.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Quadro K4000
Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.
Quadro K4000
The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 scores 2,642 and the Quadro K4000 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 768 (Quadro K4000). Raw compute: 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,642 | 2,719+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+17% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.887 TFLOPS+52% | 1.244 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 64+14% |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+250% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 has 3 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 0.38 MB (Quadro K4000) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 draws 50W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-38% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8+55% | 34.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Quadro K4000 launched at $1269 and now averages $100. The Quadro K4000 costs 16.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.0 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 27.2 (Quadro K4000) — the Quadro K4000 offers 23.6% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-76% | $1269 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $100-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0 | 27.2+24% |
| Codename | Baffin | GK106 |
| Release | March 1 2017 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #620 | #613 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Quadro K4000
