Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs GRID M10-8Q

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017Core: 1002 MHzBoost: 1053 MHz

GRID M10-8Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2,642

+1.8%

2,595

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is positioned at rank 155 and the GRID M10-8Q is on rank 346, so the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4150

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

98%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

86%

#140

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1677%

#155

Radeon Pro WX 4150

MSRP: $300|Avg: $120

100%

#158

Quadro M2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $70

98%

#159

Quadro M4000

MSRP: $791|Avg: $350

96%

#160

FirePro W4100

MSRP: $183|Avg: $183

93%

#166

FirePro W5100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

85%

#167

Radeon Pro WX 4170

MSRP: $400|Avg: $120

81%

#168

FirePro W4300

MSRP: $379|Avg: $50

81%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

81%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-8Q

#331

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

14205%

#346

GRID M10-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

100%

#347

Quadro FX 3800

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

99%

#348

FirePro V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170

99%

#350

GRID K520

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50

94%

#351

GRID P40-12Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699

93%

#352

FirePro 2270

MSRP: $149|Avg: $30

91%

#353

FirePro 2460

MSRP: $180|Avg: $10

90%

#355

FirePro 3D V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

88%

#356

Quadro FX 580

MSRP: $199|Avg: $500

88%

#358

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

87%

#359

FireStream 9270

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20

86%

#360

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

85%

#361

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-8Q.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GRID M10-8Q
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro WX 4150 holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $500), it costs 76% less, resulting in a 324.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GRID M10-8Q
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+324.2%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($120)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX 4150 Benchmark Check

GRID M10-8Q Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4150 and GRID M10-8Q

Radeon Pro WX 4150

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

GRID M10-8Q

The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 scores 2,642 and the GRID M10-8Q reaches 2,595 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GRID M10-8Q uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 640 (GRID M10-8Q). Raw compute: 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q). Boost clocks: 1053 MHz vs 1306 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GRID M10-8Q
G3D Mark Score	2,642+2%	2,595
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+40%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.887 TFLOPS+13%	1.672 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1053 MHz	1306 MHz+24%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	56+40%	40
L1 Cache	224 KB	320 KB+43%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GRID M10-8Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-8Q has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-8Q) — the GRID M10-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GRID M10-8Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 12 (12_1) (GRID M10-8Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GRID M10-8Q
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs NVENC (4th Gen) (GRID M10-8Q). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC (2nd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs H.264,H.265 (GRID M10-8Q).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GRID M10-8Q
Encoder	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)	NVENC (4th Gen)
Decoder	UVD 6.3	NVDEC (2nd Gen)
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 draws 50W versus the GRID M10-8Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 350W (GRID M10-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4150	GRID M10-8Q
TDP	50W-78%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85
Perf/Watt	52.8+359%	11.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the GRID M10-8Q launched at $2500 and now averages $500. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 costs 76% less ($380 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.0 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 5.2 (GRID M10-8Q) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 offers 323.1% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).