CPU
GPU
Radeon R5 240
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 M335
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 240 is positioned at rank 135 and the Radeon R5 M335 is on rank 547, so the Radeon R5 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 240
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M335
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 240 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 M335 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R5 240 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 240 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 240 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $40), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 306.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 240 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+306.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 240 and Radeon R5 M335
Radeon R5 240
The Radeon R5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 558 points. Launch price was $69.
Radeon R5 M335
The Radeon R5 M335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 549 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 240 scores 558 and the Radeon R5 M335 reaches 549 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 M335 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 240) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M335). Raw compute: 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 240) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M335). Boost clocks: 780 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R5 240 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 558+2% | 549 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.448 TFLOPS | 0.6592 TFLOPS+47% |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | 1030 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 20 | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 240 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 240 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M335 has 4 GB. The Radeon R5 M335 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R5 240) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M335) — the Radeon R5 240 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 240 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 240 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 M335's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R5 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon R5 240) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M335). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R5 240 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.6+155% | 7.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 240 launched at $59 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon R5 M335 launched at $150 and now averages $40. The Radeon R5 240 costs 75% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.8 (Radeon R5 240) vs 13.7 (Radeon R5 M335) — the Radeon R5 240 offers 307.3% better value. The Radeon R5 M335 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R5 240 | Radeon R5 M335 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59-61% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-75% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.8+307% | 13.7 |
| Codename | Oland | Jet |
| Release | October 8 2013 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #911 | #922 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 240 and Radeon R5 M335
