Radeon R5 240 vs Radeon R5 M335

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 240 vs Radeon R5 M335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 240 vs Radeon R5 M335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 240

2013

Why buy it

✅3.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 158.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 M335

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 240 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
154.2% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 240 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (558 vs 549), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R5 240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $91 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 158.4% (9.5 vs 3.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R5 240 vs Radeon R5 M335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R5 240

The Radeon R5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 558 points. Launch price was $69.

Radeon R5 M335

The Radeon R5 M335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 549 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 240 scores 558 and the Radeon R5 M335 reaches 549 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 240 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 M335 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 240) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M335). Raw compute: 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 240) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M335). Boost clocks: 780 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R5 240	Radeon R5 M335
G3D Mark Score	558+2%	549
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.448 TFLOPS	0.6592 TFLOPS+47%
Boost Clock	780 MHz	1030 MHz+32%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	20	20
L1 Cache	80 KB	80 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R5 240	Radeon R5 M335
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R5 240 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M335 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M335 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 240 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M335. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R5 240) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M335) — the Radeon R5 240 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R5 240	Radeon R5 M335
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 240 draws 30W versus the Radeon R5 M335's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R5 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon R5 240) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M335). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R5 240	Radeon R5 M335
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	168mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	18.6+155%	7.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 240 came in at $59, while the Radeon R5 M335 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon R5 240 was 60.7% cheaper ($91 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (Radeon R5 240) vs 3.7 (Radeon R5 M335) — the Radeon R5 240 offers 156.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M335 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R5 240	Radeon R5 M335
MSRP	$59-61%	$150
Performance per Dollar	9.5+157%	3.7
Codename	Oland	Jet
Release	October 8 2013	May 15 2016
Ranking	#911	#922

Search Radeon R5 240 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.