
Radeon R7 260X vs GRID P100-8Q

Radeon R7 260X
Popular choices:

GRID P100-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID P100-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P100-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 260X.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260X | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 260X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 260X holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $550), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 258.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 260X | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+258.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 260X and GRID P100-8Q

Radeon R7 260X
The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.

GRID P100-8Q
The GRID P100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,267 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 260X scores 3,198 and the GRID P100-8Q reaches 3,267 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 260X is built on GCN 2.0 while the GRID P100-8Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 640 (GRID P100-8Q). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID P100-8Q). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,198 | 3,267+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+40% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS+18% | 1.672 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1306 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 320 KB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260X) vs 2 MB (GRID P100-8Q) — the GRID P100-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 260X draws 115W versus the GRID P100-8Q's 225W — a 64.7% difference. The Radeon R7 260X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R7 260X) vs 350W (GRID P100-8Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-49% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 27.8+92% | 14.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 260X launched at $139 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GRID P100-8Q launched at $7374 and now averages $550. The Radeon R7 260X costs 72.7% less ($400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.3 (Radeon R7 260X) vs 5.9 (GRID P100-8Q) — the Radeon R7 260X offers 261% better value. The GRID P100-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R7 260X | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139-98% | $7374 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-73% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.3+261% | 5.9 |
| Codename | Bonaire | GM107 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #568 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















